Sta Bárbara district mission census & descriptive report 1807 — pop. table (Indians vs. *gente de razón*) for presidio + Los Ángeles + 5 missions (total 6,231 vs. 6,166 in 1806); Indian baptisms 340 vs. deaths 400 (net decline); church fabric (adobe/tile), friar-managed common funds, industries (wool weaving, carpentry, leather — vaquetas/badanas/gamuzas — shoemaking, saddlery), Chumash ('canal de Sta Bárba') ethnography — *expandable*
| Date | 1807-12-31 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | José Argüello[?] |
| Place | Santa Bárbara |
| Series | Provincial State Papers, Benicia (Military) |
| Tomo | XX–XXXIX (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | 687–90 |
| Savage copy page | 360–361 |
| Scan leaf | n359–360 |
| Document type | abstract (census + descriptive) |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n359–360
How to cite this document
José Argüello[?], Santa Bárbara, 1807-12-31, Provincial State Papers, Benicia (Military), XX–XXXIX, 687–90, Archives of California, C-A 16, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within XX–XXXIX]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca16/ca16-d583.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.