Burglary/theft from the presidio warehouse (night 23 Oct). Accused: Indians Policarpo (Mission S. Vicente, Baja Cal.) & Francisco (Mission SF, Alta Cal.). Notable fiscal dictamen on the futility of punishing Indian theft now that the new legislation has abolished flogging — 'un vicio casi connatural en la mayor parte de los Indios'
| Date | 1822-11-21 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | fiscal Tte. José Joaquín Maitorena (begun by Tte. José M.ª Estudillo); defender Tte. Marcos Faboyat |
| Place | Santa Bárbara |
| Series | Dep. State Papers, Benicia (Military) |
| Tomo | LIII–LXVIII (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | 848–71 |
| Scan leaf | n88 |
| Document type | transcription |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n88
How to cite this document
fiscal Tte. José Joaquín Maitorena (begun by Tte. José M.ª Estudillo); defender Tte. Marcos Faboyat, Santa Bárbara, 1822-11-21, Dep. State Papers, Benicia (Military), LIII–LXVIII, 848–71, Archives of California, C-A 18, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within LIII–LXVIII]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca18/ca18-d23.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.