Resolution of the bigamy case vs. Alférez José Mª Ramírez: accused of marrying Dolores Palomares (daughter of retired soldier José Palomares) at Los Ángeles while married in México to Dolores Olvera; separated from his wife 2 yrs 3 mo during the case. Per Ramírez's confession, Olvera had been only his concubine (family by her) not legal wife. Echeandía, finding bigamy not proven, orders him to rejoin his legal wife & notifies the ecclesiastical curia. Orig. pp.23–254.
| Date | 1830-06-21 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Echeandía |
| Place | Monterey |
| Series | Dep. State Papers, Benicia (Military) |
| Tomo | LXIX–LXXVII (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | 23–254 |
| Savage copy page | 33–34 |
| Scan leaf | n33–n34 |
| Document type | verbatim/criminal |
| Source | verbatim transcription |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n33–n34
How to cite this document
Echeandía, Monterey, 1830-06-21, Dep. State Papers, Benicia (Military), LXIX–LXXVII, 23–254, Archives of California, C-A 19, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within LXIX–LXXVII]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca19/ca19-d34.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.