Multi-subject: procesos of Sales & soldiers Cordero/Valenzuela received; the pobladores' 'insolencia' instancia (certified copy; original in the Gobº archive); ⭐⭐ remits 'EL PLANO DE LA REPARTICIÓN DE TIERRAS para labores, hecha á los POBLADORES DE S. JOSÉ; que por no tener orden, NO HA REPARTIDO LOS SOLARES' [the San José land-repartition plan — suertes distributed, house-lots awaiting orders; the SJ sibling of the LA plat]; the 5-year-asiento/diezmo question; the ganado + maize/trigo/frijol harvest notas; archive extract + his escolta instructions [= doc 81] for approval
| Date | 1782-12-01 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Moraga |
| To | Fages |
| Place | San Francisco |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | III |
| Original tomo page | p.352–353 |
| Savage copy page | 175–176 |
| Scan leaf | n178–n179 |
| Document type | abstract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n178–n179
How to cite this document
Moraga to Fages, San Francisco, 1782-12-01, Provincial State Papers, III, p.352–353, Archives of California, C-A 2, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca2/ca2-d80.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.