Asks under what formula the juramento (oath) mentioned in the actas of 26–27 Jan should be given, noting the Ley de 30 Sept 1823 was derogated on that point by art. 163 of the Federal Constitution — a constitutional nuance on the oath of office ⚠ UNCITED (Sav p.40, gap)
| Date | 1832-02-11 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Echeandía (Los Ángeles) |
| To | Pío Pico |
| Series | Departmental State Papers |
| Tomo | III |
| Original tomo page | iii.116 |
| Savage copy page | 40 |
| Scan leaf | n39 |
| Document type | abstract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n39
How to cite this document
Echeandía (Los Ángeles) to Pío Pico, 1832-02-11, Departmental State Papers, iii.116, Archives of California, C-A 28, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca28/ca28-d42.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.