General Congress declares Veracruz state decree no. 138 contrary to art. 158 of the Federal Constitution, and orders the body installed with the individuals named in the final junta of 5 October last. Savage: 'Decreto del Cong. Gral. declarando contrario al Artº 158 de la Constitucion Fedral., el Decreto Nº 138 del H. Congreso de Veracruz, y mandando se instale con los individuos nombrados en la junta final de 5 de Obre. ultº'
| Date | 1829-02-12 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Congreso General |
| To | Congress of Veracruz |
| Place | Mexico [Mejico] |
| Series | Departmental State Papers, San José |
| Tomo | I–III (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | p. 219 |
| Savage copy page | 183 [printed stamp] / 32 [hw foliation, below stamp] |
| Scan leaf | n183 |
| Document type | decree |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n183
How to cite this document
Congreso General to Congress of Veracruz, Mexico [Mejico], 1829-02-12, Departmental State Papers, San José, I–III, p. 219, Archives of California, C-A 44, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within I–III]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca44/ca44-d169.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.