Ports regime — foreign commerce ships admitted at SF/SB/S. Pedro only with a permit from the Monterey or SD comte, after the rentas encargado confirms the ship is dispatched per the 30 Sept circular; unpermitted ships not to be admitted
| Date | 1829-02-07 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Echeandía |
| To | 4 comtes (Monterey/SD/SF/SB) + encargado de S. Pedro |
| Series | Departmental Records |
| Tomo | VII–VIII (Books 33–37, 1829 → Jan 1831) (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | p.360 |
| Scan leaf | n80 |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n80
How to cite this document
Echeandía to 4 comtes (Monterey/SD/SF/SB) + encargado de S. Pedro, 1829-02-07, Departmental Records, VII–VIII (Books 33–37, 1829 → Jan 1831), p.360, Archives of California, C-A 48, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within VII–VIII (Books 33–37, 1829 → Jan 1831)]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca48/ca48-d171.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.