Sharp personal rebuke replying to Bandini's 7 Aug oficio — dismisses his complaints as attacks on the governor's *decoro*; accuses him of self-interest in 'el Comercio federal' and of sustaining 'los escandalosos desórdenes en que ha estado la administración'; jabs that Bandini's *hermano político* profited from a 'protección pública' that produced only 'la ruina de abusos'; ties it to Bandini's conduct as administrator of the Aduana (customs) at San Diego, then under investigation; refuses further engagement (see Entry 2)
| Date | 1831-09-07 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Victoria |
| To | Comte Juan Bandini |
| Place | Monterey |
| Series | Departmental Records |
| Tomo | IX–XIV (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | 91–93 |
| Savage copy page | 44–46 |
| Scan leaf | n43–n45 |
| Document type | abstract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n43–n45
How to cite this document
Victoria to Comte Juan Bandini, Monterey, 1831-09-07, Departmental Records, IX–XIV, 91–93, Archives of California, C-A 49, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within IX–XIV]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca49/ca49-d154.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.