report of the FIRST (failed) expedition against Estanislao, May 1829 — the rebels fortified on the Río de los Laquisimes (Stanislaus R.) in an 'impregnable wood'; the *pedrero*'s carriage broke on the 1st shot; ⭐⭐⭐ Estanislao (named 'cabecilla principal') came to parley but refused to surrender ('había provocado… y morirían'); the neophytes returned arrows and firearms; 4 soldiers broke ranks to steal horses → 2 soldiers killed & beheaded, bodies thrown in the river; final: 2 dead + 8 wounded (3 serious) + 3 auxiliaries (1 mortal), armament ruined; commends cabo Antonio Soto, soldiers Manuel Piña & Tomás Pacheco
| Date | 1829-05-16 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | José Sánchez (San José) |
| To | Comandante Ignacio Martínez |
| Series | State Papers, Missions and Colonization |
| Tomo | II |
| Original tomo page | p.37–44 |
| Savage copy page | 16–21 |
| Scan leaf | n15–20 |
| Document type | abstract (corr.) |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n15–20
How to cite this document
José Sánchez (San José) to Comandante Ignacio Martínez, 1829-05-16, State Papers, Missions and Colonization, II, p.37–44, Archives of California, C-A 53, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca53/ca53-d10.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.