the arbitrios committee opines that the missions — though still named 'Misiones' — are legally pueblos of the Republic (they 'should already be secularized by law') and must therefore pay *propios y arbitrios* like all other inhabitants; proposes the *reducciones/pueblos de indígenas* stand subject to the *cabecera-de-partido* political authority; approved by Figueroa & the Diputación 30 Oct 1834
| Date | 1834-10-30 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | José Antº Carrillo & J. Mª Estudillo |
| Place | arbitrios cmte; approved Figueroa/Diputación |
| Series | State Papers, Missions and Colonization |
| Tomo | II |
| Original tomo page | p.263–264 (Sav. pp. 368–9) |
| Savage copy page | 175–176 |
| Scan leaf | n173–174 |
| Document type | abstract (dictamen) |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n173–174
How to cite this document
José Antº Carrillo & J. Mª Estudillo, arbitrios cmte; approved Figueroa/Diputación, 1834-10-30, State Papers, Missions and Colonization, II, p.263–264 (Sav. pp. 368–9), Archives of California, C-A 53, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca53/ca53-d92.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.