Durán's canonical opinion (as Vicario Forense) on the duel between cabo Camilo Berenda[?] & Melitón Sota[?] near Monterey Presidio — cites the Council of Trent (Session 25) condemning duels as 'detestable, introduced by the Devil'; rules it a 'simple and private' duel, both duelists incurring excommunication ipso facto (papally reserved), needing absolution + public satisfaction for the scandal
| Date | 1825-04-15 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Fr. Narciso Durán (San José) |
| To | Luis Antonio Argüello |
| Series | State Papers, Sacramento |
| Tomo | X–XIX (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | XIX·44–52 |
| Savage copy page | 397–401 |
| Scan leaf | n396–400 |
| Document type | abstract (corr.) |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n396–400
How to cite this document
Fr. Narciso Durán (San José) to Luis Antonio Argüello, 1825-04-15, State Papers, Sacramento, X–XIX, XIX·44–52, Archives of California, C-A 56, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within X–XIX]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca56/ca56-d458.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.