STRUCTURAL TITLE LEAF, no document. Reads: 'Superior Government State Papers / Benicia / Vol. 8. XXI / Decrees & Despatches / 1831 - 1841. / Sturtz 10'. Both the arabic 8 and the roman XXI are struck through. 'Sturtz 10' [reading uncertain, possibly Shurtz] is written and underlined at the foot. The ink foliation RESETS here from 19 to 1; the Bancroft stamp continues unbroken (78 to 79). On this leaf alone the ink number sits ABOVE the stamp rather than below it.
| Date | [section covers] 1831-1841 (month) |
|---|---|
| From | [n/a] |
| Place | [n/a] |
| Series | Superior Government State Papers, Benicia |
| Tomo | XIX–XXI (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | p.[none - title leaf] |
| Savage copy page | 1. (ink) / 79 (stamp) |
| Scan leaf | n78 |
| Document type | title leaf (structural) |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n78
How to cite this document
[n/a], [n/a], [section covers] 1831-1841, Superior Government State Papers, Benicia, XIX–XXI, p.[none - title leaf], Archives of California, C-A 58, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within XIX–XXI]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca58/ca58-d64.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.