Doc N.o 3 of 3 in the Cot packet. Savage: 'Doc. N.o 3. = Explanatory letter to Col. Stevenson setting forth that the above application had not been attended to by Com. Stockton or Lieut. Gillespie to whom the business was diputed [deputed] in consequence whereof he should reclaim for damage sustained by arbitrary act of Col. Fremont as to the $2437.50 purposted [purported] to be paid to Gov.t States, that he has no other evidence thereof save what appears from Doct. N.o 1 the partial receipts being cancelled thereby'.
| Date | [no internal date given; packet head 1847-10-19] (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Ant.o José Cot |
| To | Col. Stevenson |
| Place | Los Angeles [Ang.s, per packet head] |
| Series | Miscellaneous / Unbound Documents |
| Tomo | Unbound |
| Original tomo page | — |
| Savage copy page | 280 [stamp] / 279 [hand] |
| Scan leaf | n282 |
| Document type | letter (in English) |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n282
How to cite this document
Ant.o José Cot to Col. Stevenson, Los Angeles [Ang.s, per packet head], [no internal date given; packet head 1847-10-19], Miscellaneous / Unbound Documents, Unbound, —, Archives of California, C-A 63, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca63/ca63-d413.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.