General foreign-ship EXCLUSION order, synthesizing the whole policy (verified scale 1; see E16): no foreign ships in American ports — expel any arrival 'sin pretexto ni excusa,' no one 'por privilegiada q[ue] sea' to trade 'directa ó indirectamente,' nor even supply victuals; only in the remote case of urgent necessity give 'los precisos auxilios que exige la Hospitalidad, y pida el Derecho de Gentes,' with precautions 'á q[ue] no tomen conocimto del país'; and names Vancouver & Puget (in port w/ the *Descubierta* & *Chatham*) — already given full aid at Monterey, so any request at other ports 'deberá ser destituida,' made to understand the orders so they retire
| Date | 1794-11-12 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Borica (Monterey) |
| To | Cmdt of Presidio |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | XII |
| Original tomo page | 485–486 |
| Savage copy page | 185–186 |
| Scan leaf | n189–n190 |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n189–n190
How to cite this document
Borica (Monterey) to Cmdt of Presidio, 1794-11-12, Provincial State Papers, XII, 485–486, Archives of California, C-A 7, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca7/ca7-d284.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.