Fiscal/Junta dossier responding to Borica's 27 Jun consulta on the SF presidio (see E19): the SF presidio 'muy arruinada,' the proposal to relocate it closer to the port; doubts on the new *fábrica*'s solidity (begun 1776); the fort-works cost ($11,716.3.8; Contador José María Beltrán); + Tribunal proposals — schools for men & women, take 14-yr-olds from the foundling house (*casa de expósitos*) to work the fort, a nuns' monastery (deemed unnecessary), artisans at low pay; endorses proceeding w/ the new SF presidio *fábrica*
| Date | 1795-12-04 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Branciforte (México) |
| To | Gov. of Cal. |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | XIII |
| Original tomo page | xiii.82–86 |
| Savage copy page | (32)–(36) |
| Scan leaf | n250–n254 |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n250–n254
How to cite this document
Branciforte (México) to Gov. of Cal., 1795-12-04, Provincial State Papers, xiii.82–86, Archives of California, C-A 7, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca7/ca7-d361.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.