'Satisfacción' — point-by-point reply to the audit objections (*reparos*) against the liquidated judgment of the Loreto presidio Real Hacienda accounts 1787–92 (objections numbered through ~18, then a 7-point set): *plomo de tiradura*, weights, the habilitado being 'recién venido,' etc. ⭐ Objection 7 concerns the San Blas Comisaría's 1792–93 supplies to the ships *San Carlos*, *Concepción* & the goleta *Saturnina* (the Bodega/Vancouver-era vessels) — still unsettled. Ends 'Omito el responder'
| Date | (1797 audit; re yrs 1787–92) (year) |
|---|---|
| From | (auditor) |
| To | Tribunal |
| Place | (México) |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | XVI |
| Original tomo page | 11–21 |
| Scan leaf | n10–n19 |
| Document type | abstract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n10–n19
How to cite this document
(auditor) to Tribunal, (México), (1797 audit; re yrs 1787–92), Provincial State Papers, XVI, 11–21, Archives of California, C-A 9, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca9/ca9-d7.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.