(2 docs) Survey mission lands from villa boundary (cultivated vs not). 6 questions on Branciforte-Mission conflict: (1) Has Branciforte harmed Mission Santa Cruz? (2) Can mission maintain orchards/irrigated lands? (3) Has mission supplied troops with seeds? (4) Works done and by whom? (5) Is blacksmith teaching neophytes? (6) Is SF soldier (mason) working on mission buildings?
| Date | 1798-01-16 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Borica |
| To | Alberto de Córdoba |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | XXI |
| Original tomo page | p.~xxii.673–8 |
| Savage copy page | — |
| Scan leaf | n276–277 |
| Document type | abstract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n276–277
How to cite this document
Borica to Alberto de Córdoba, 1798-01-16, Provincial State Papers, XXI, p.~xxii.673–8, Archives of California, C-A 14, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [page interpolated; verify at the leaf]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca14/ca14-d338.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.