Tail of Marmolejo case, then ⭐⭐⭐ San Luis Rey neophyte conspiracy begins: causa criminal vs. Indians of ex-mission San Luis Rey accused of an uprising ('tumultuarios'). Report of 16 Apr from Capitán Pablo de la Portilla (of the S.L. Rey force) to Comdte Genl José Figueroa; on the night of 13th the neophytes Julián [Murillo], José Miguel & Nepomuceno, gathered at the Temescal, plotted; would summon the gentiles of the sierra.
| Date | (cont.) · 5 Nov 1835, Monterey |
|---|---|
| From | Nicolás Gutiérrez, Comdte Genl |
| Series | Dep. State Papers, Benicia (Military) |
| Tomo | LXXVIII–LXXXVIII (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | p.(see above) → begins pp.380 |
| Savage copy page | 194 |
| Scan leaf | n193 |
| Document type | abstract + testimony |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n193
How to cite this document
Nicolás Gutiérrez, Comdte Genl, (cont.) · 5 Nov 1835, Monterey, Dep. State Papers, Benicia (Military), LXXVIII–LXXXVIII, p.(see above) → begins pp.380, Archives of California, C-A 20, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within LXXVIII–LXXXVIII]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca20/ca20-d233.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.