On a Real Indulto: the Auditor de Guerra Galindo Navarro rules Fages overstepped in declaring the SB soldier Cechinela[?] pardoned (the indulto was promulgated Oct 1784, *before* Cechinela's arrest; & Fages lacked the faculty) — but, given mitigating circumstances, opines the man be freed & separated from his company, and Fages warned of the error
| Date | 1786-01-10 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Ugarte y Loyola (Chihuahua) |
| To | Fages |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | VI |
| Original tomo page | vi.217–219 |
| Savage copy page | 358–359 |
| Scan leaf | n361–n362 |
| Document type | abstract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n361–n362
How to cite this document
Ugarte y Loyola (Chihuahua) to Fages, 1786-01-10, Provincial State Papers, vi.217–219, Archives of California, C-A 3, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca3/ca3-d400.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.