Abel Stearns embargo case, resolution: the original expediente sent to the Promotor Fiscal for dictamen; the Juzgado to list the effects with yardage/varas per piece to collect duties; Stearns produced documents proving the embargoed effects 'son de lícito comercio'; the 1ª-Instancia Judge's sentence testimony received (26 Mar 1841)
| Date | 1840-11→1841-03-26 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Adm. de Aduana de Monterey |
| To | Promotor Fiscal / Juzgado / Prefecto del 2º Distrito |
| Place | Monterey |
| Series | Departmental State Papers, Benicia |
| Tomo | II (Miscellaneous) (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | p.15–18 |
| Savage copy page | 235–236 |
| Scan leaf | n235–n236 |
| Document type | abstract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n235–n236
How to cite this document
Adm. de Aduana de Monterey to Promotor Fiscal / Juzgado / Prefecto del 2º Distrito, Monterey, 1840-11→1841-03-26, Departmental State Papers, Benicia, II (Miscellaneous), p.15–18, Archives of California, C-A 39, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within II (Miscellaneous)]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca39/ca39-d91.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.