the committee's dictamen on the Chico–Durán affair, siding with the government: characterizes Durán's resistance as the padres' grief at losing 'el poder temporal con que á la desgraciada California mantenían en el envilecimiento y la obscuridad'; finds Chico facultado to secularize Sta Inés & S. Buenaventura, approved 1 July 1836 (the secular-californio counter-view completing docs 157–158)
| Date | 1836-06-30 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Comisión de Misiones — David Spence & Manuel Crespo (Monterey) |
| To | la Junta Departamental |
| Series | State Papers, Missions and Colonization |
| Tomo | II |
| Original tomo page | p.384–386 (Sav. pp. 639–42) |
| Savage copy page | 303–305 |
| Scan leaf | n302–304 |
| Document type | abstract (dictamen) |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n302–304
How to cite this document
Comisión de Misiones — David Spence & Manuel Crespo (Monterey) to la Junta Departamental, 1836-06-30, State Papers, Missions and Colonization, II, p.384–386 (Sav. pp. 639–42), Archives of California, C-A 53, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca53/ca53-d169.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.