Forwards + transcribes the R. Cédula of 21 Dec 1787 on jurisdiction over *causas de concubinato* (mixed fuero church vs. royal courts; cites the 1771/1777 cédulas + Obispo de Plasencia). ⭐ Circulation-compliance certs name the four presidio commanders, 1792: Hermenegildo Sal (SF, 26 Feb), José Argüello (Monterey, 28 Jul), Felipe Goycoechea (Sta Bárbara, 8 Aug), Juan Pablo Grijalva (San Diego, 14 Aug); + the printed cédula (pp.292–294)
| Date | 1791-08-17 / 1787-12-21 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Nava |
| To | Gov.; Romeu (copy); 'Yo el Rey' / Antonio Ventura de Taranco |
| Place | Chihuahua / Monterey / Madrid |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | X |
| Original tomo page | p.286–294 |
| Savage copy page | 81–83 |
| Scan leaf | n82–n84 |
| Document type | extract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n82–n84
How to cite this document
Nava to Gov.; Romeu (copy); 'Yo el Rey' / Antonio Ventura de Taranco, Chihuahua / Monterey / Madrid, 1791-08-17 / 1787-12-21, Provincial State Papers, X, p.286–294, Archives of California, C-A 6, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca6/ca6-d88.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.