2º of the pair Savage counts as '(2 doc)'. Savage repeats the correspondent line only with ditto marks and supplies ONE joint abstract and ONE cite for both documents, so this second item has no separately transcribable date, incipit or content. Rowed to preserve the item count Savage himself states; flagged for the reviewer. [No independent content survives in the Savage copy]
| Date | 1848-02-02 [date given by ditto marks only] (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Ant.º Campuzano |
| To | 'los Comisionados de Guerra de Baja California' [heading repeated by ditto marks] |
| Place | S. José de Guaimas [Guaymas] |
| Series | Archives of California, Miscellaneous |
| Tomo | — |
| Original tomo page | pp. 482 — 6 |
| Savage copy page | 159 [stamp] / 33 [hand] |
| Scan leaf | n180 |
| Document type | letter (official) |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n180
How to cite this document
Ant.º Campuzano to 'los Comisionados de Guerra de Baja California' [heading repeated by ditto marks], S. José de Guaimas [Guaymas], 1848-02-02 [date given by ditto marks only], Miscellaneous, —, pp. 482 — 6, Archives of California, C-A 62, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca62/ca62-d151.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.