Rewritten 2026-09-22 from a direct reading of the leaf (previously read only in summary). The entry formerly described a document the leaf does not hold; its erratum records the original text. VERBATIM HEADING: «1797. Mayo 31. S.n Fr.co / Carrillo a Borica». SUBSTANCE: passes the diary of the Santa Cruz escolta, which had been left behind in the last correo.
| Date | 1797-05-31 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Raymundo Carrillo |
| To | Diego de Borica |
| Place | San Francisco |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | XV |
| Original tomo page | p.28 |
| Savage copy page | 206 / 9 |
| Scan leaf | n200 |
| Document type | abstract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n200
How to cite this document
Raymundo Carrillo to Diego de Borica, San Francisco, 1797-05-31, Provincial State Papers, XV, p.28, Archives of California, C-A 8, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca8/ca8-d265.htmlCorrection to this entry.
- Previously read summary: 'Extracto de revista Mar; personnel changes'; orig_page: 'p.20–22'; scan: 'n200'. n200 (stamp 206 / ink 9): same stretch; no extracto de revista at the claimed pp.20-22.
The originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.