“Dice q.e no se remitió el quinto de perlas porq.e Arrillaga estaba reconociendo terreno de la frontera y del Colorado y su encargado Fr.co Roa[?] en Loreto era de poco empeño.” = the royal fifth on pearls was not remitted because Arrillaga was reconnoitring the frontier and Colorado country and his deputy Francisco Roa[?] at Loreto was slack.
| Date | 1797 Nov. 13 (heading “Id.”) (year) |
|---|---|
| From | Borica al Virrey |
| Place | Monterrey (subject: Loreto, the frontier and the Colorado) |
| Series | Provincial Records |
| Tomo | V–VII (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | p. 211-2. |
| Savage copy page | 383 / 59. |
| Scan leaf | n384 |
| Document type | register entry (abstract) |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n384
How to cite this document
Borica al Virrey, Monterrey (subject: Loreto, the frontier and the Colorado), 1797 Nov. 13 (heading “Id.”), Provincial Records, V–VII, p. 211-2., Archives of California, C-A 24, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within V–VII]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca24/ca24-d610.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.