'Que la demanda contra Alipaz pr riña con Juan Bandini, aunque civil, pertenece al juzgado Militar, y todos los asuntos, civiles ó militares, son de la competencia en ese Presidio (Sn Diego) de su Comte Pablo de la Portilla, y pr consecuencia mal fundada la qº le suscitó apoyandose en Decreto 9 Febº 1793' — rules the Alipaz–Bandini suit belongs to the military court under Comte Portilla; the objection based on the 9 Feb 1793 decree is ill-founded.
| Date | 1829-01-05 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Echeandía |
| To | Comandante de San Diego |
| Place | Santa Bárbara |
| Series | Departmental Records |
| Tomo | IV–VI (Books 16–20, 27–32) (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | p.690-3 |
| Scan leaf | n364 |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n364
How to cite this document
Echeandía to Comandante de San Diego, Santa Bárbara, 1829-01-05, Departmental Records, IV–VI (Books 16–20, 27–32), p.690-3, Archives of California, C-A 47, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within IV–VI (Books 16–20, 27–32)]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca47/ca47-d1423.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.