One-line viceregal acuerdo closing the fiscal expediente, transcribed verbatim: 'Megico 3 de Abril de 1790 = Como pide el Sor. Fiscal de Real Hacienda = Revilla-Gigedo.' Approves the artisan/menestrales provisions of the dictamen of 31 March 1790. Itemized separately per the itemisation policy; Savage counted it inside his '(2 Dctos)' entry.
| Date | 1790-04-03 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | El Virrey Conde de Revilla Gigedo (acuerdo on the Fiscal's dictamen) |
| Place | Megico |
| Series | State Papers, Sacramento |
| Tomo | VI–IX (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | p.[none of its own; falls inside pp. 128.-137. = 128-137] |
| Savage copy page | 65. (Bancroft stamp 370) |
| Scan leaf | n369 |
| Document type | decreto virreinal |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n369
How to cite this document
El Virrey Conde de Revilla Gigedo (acuerdo on the Fiscal's dictamen), Megico, 1790-04-03, State Papers, Sacramento, VI–IX, p.[none of its own; falls inside pp. 128.-137. = 128-137], Archives of California, C-A 55, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within VI–IX]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca55/ca55-d402.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.