⚠ MIS-MAPPED (found 2026-07-09): the 'CRITICAL war assessment (118 cartuchos, no artilleryman, Indians may side with English)' clause belongs to the 10 Apr 1797 Goycoechea→Borica letter at scans n236–238 (leaf-verified; see the ca8 survey #32). This record's claimed scan n254–255 actually shows JUNE 1797 admin entries (soldado Piña's wife; the work-dress order, pp. 185–188), not Nov-1797 content — the C-A 8 DB block's scan-mapping is suspect; verify any leaf before citing
| Date | 1797-11-30 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Goycoechea |
| To | Borica, SB |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | XV |
| Original tomo page | p.160–164 |
| Savage copy page | 258–259 |
| Scan leaf | n254–255 |
| Document type | abstract |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n254–255
How to cite this document
Goycoechea to Borica, SB, 1797-11-30, Provincial State Papers, XV, p.160–164, Archives of California, C-A 8, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca8/ca8-d304.htmlCorrection to this entry.
- This record was corrected at the manuscript on 2026-07-09 and its summary now carries that finding. AS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED the row described a document that is not on this leaf — anyone who cited it before that date should re-check.
The originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.