CONCLUSION of the Indian-policy dictamen rowed at n478 — do NOT count twice. Cites 'el art. 116. q.e previene mantener en su inocencia á los indios del canal de S.ta Barb.a, en quietud á los de las mis.s de S.n Diego, S.n Gabriel y S.n Fr.co' and 'el mas justo arreglo, subordinacion y disciplina á unas tropas q.e solo sirven en el presente estado sistema para infundir respeto, dar buen ejemplo á los indios y castigar con prudencia los escesos q.e cometan.' 'Recomienda el fiscal q.e en el castigo de los 9 gentiles por el homicidio de los 7 cristianos en 95 — se castiguen mas con prudencia q.e con rigor. El virrey manda al gob.r proceder á la ejecucion de lo espresado etc.'
| Date | 1797 Dic. 20 [conclusion] (year) |
|---|---|
| From | Branciforte a Borica |
| Place | Orizaba |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | XV |
| Original tomo page | pp. 858 - 866. [conclusion of the item anchored at n478] |
| Savage copy page | 480 [printed stamp] / 283 [ink folio, to the RIGHT of the stamp] |
| Scan leaf | n479 |
| Document type | conclusion of the n478 item — NOT a separate document; recorded here only for its content and cite |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n479
This entry is not citable as a document. The catalogue withdraws or qualifies it, so read the note above and follow it to the record that supersedes it. No citation is offered here on purpose.
The originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.