Second cross-reference stub of the same date, not copied out: 'Comunica la R.l órden sobre gracia de inválido, que está á folio 17 de estos manuscritos en este mismo tomo.' [Communicates the royal order on the grant of invalid status, already transcribed at folio 17 of the same tomo.] Note Savage cites this one by FOLIO, not page, unlike the n229 stub which cites pp. 5 y 6 — the two reference systems appear side by side. Marginal mark: v
| Date | 1788-12-09 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | Pedro Fages |
| To | José Francisco Ortega |
| Place | Monterey |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | VII–VIII (volume range; this entry is not resolved to one tomo) |
| Original tomo page | pp. 136-138 |
| Savage copy page | 231 [stamp] / 46 [hand] |
| Scan leaf | n231 |
| Document type | letter (cross-reference only) |
| Source | reference |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n231
How to cite this document
Pedro Fages to José Francisco Ortega, Monterey, 1788-12-09, Provincial State Papers, VII–VIII, pp. 136-138, Archives of California, C-A 4, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley. [the tomo is given as the volume’s full range: this entry has not been resolved to a single tomo within VII–VIII]Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca4/ca4-d280.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.