«Dice que la que han hecho por las que se le han formado por Dn Nicolas Soler, no lo libra de la acusacion de haber salido descubierto.» — the writer rejects Salas's defence against the accounts drawn up against him by Nicolás Soler: the defence does not clear him of the charge of having come out short. Savage: «Al calce está ésta inscripcion (Este se pasó en la fecha espresada y la rúbrica de Fages.»
| Date | 1789-05-18 (exact) |
|---|---|
| From | [no expresa quien lo dirige; «la rúbrica de Fages» at foot] |
| To | Dn R. Salas |
| Place | Santa Bárbara |
| Series | Provincial State Papers |
| Tomo | IX |
| Original tomo page | pp.14-16 |
| Savage copy page | 7/6 |
| Scan leaf | n7 |
| Document type | letter |
| Source | Savage abstract |
Read this leaf on the Internet Archive ↗ · leaf n7
How to cite this document
[no expresa quien lo dirige; «la rúbrica de Fages» at foot] to Dn R. Salas, Santa Bárbara, 1789-05-18, Provincial State Papers, IX, pp.14-16, Archives of California, C-A 5, Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Cite the document by series, tomo and original tomo page, as the literature does; the C-A number locates it in the repository. To cite this catalogue entry itself, use https://archivesofcalifornia.com/record/ca5/ca5-d8.htmlThe originals of these records burned in the 1906 San Francisco fire. What survives is Thomas Savage’s 1870s copy, and this page describes that copy.
See something wrong? Corrections are reviewed against the leaf and published in the errata register on this very page, with credit.
What kind of problem?
What should it say? (quote the leaf if you can)
Your name (optional, for the acknowledgment):
Thank you very much for helping. Accepted corrections appear on this page, in the corrections block above, with your name beside the fix.